|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
HOME | RESEARCH | EVENTS | WEBINARS | WHITE PAPERS | LIGHT READING | LR EUROPE | LR ASIA | CABLE DIGITAL NEWS | CONTACT US | REGISTER |
|||||||||||||
|
CHANNELS | Convergence | Handhelds | Applications | Workforce | Mobile/Wireless Systems | RFID | Telco Wireless | WiMax | Wireless VOIP | WLANs - WiFi - 802.11
|
|||||||||||||
|
Unstrung Column
Cellular Looks to Converged Access NetworksJuly 24, 2006 | Gabriel Brown
| Post a comment
no ratings As they refine the business case for third-generation (3G) data services and look to save money by combining second-generation (2G) and 3G onto a single network, cellular operators are rethinking traditional leased-line backhaul architectures in favor of more cost-effective, packet-switched transmission between base stations and core switching sites. Driving this change is a greater focus on operational efficiency and the expectation that new 3G networks will generate a surge in data traffic, finds the latest Unstrung Insider research report: Wireless Backhaul & 3G Network Economics. The critical concern is that the prevailing Time Division Multiplexing (TDM)-based leased-line backhaul architectures, deployed to support 2G voice networks, and the overlay Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) networks deployed for 3G, will not scale elegantly and cost-effectively enough to support future price/performance requirements. Thus operators are looking for ways to migrate existing networks onto converged 2G/3G packet-based transmission networks. The aim is to reduce operational expenditures (opex) by combining two separate networks; to make more efficient use of bandwidth through the use of statistical multiplexing, grooming, compression, and quality of service (QOS); and to decouple the cost of running the network from incremental increases in the number of users or data traffic growth. This last point is critical, since the profitability of data services will suffer if the cost of transmission increases linearly with network usage. Instead, the requirement is for backhaul networks in which the incremental cost of adding new users and more traffic is as close to zero as possible. As they evaluate their backhaul options, operators are weighing "lease vs. build" approaches to access and metro networks (many already have wholly owned core networks), with a focus on how quickly capital investment (capex) in self-built transmission can generate a return on investment, compared to the ongoing opex costs associated with leased lines. How the lease vs. build debate will play out, and how best to design and deploy the next-generation of mobile backhaul networks, is still far from clear. At issue are the wide varieties of local market pricing and regulation; the availability and pricing of leased lines and dark fiber; the uncertainty over how much demand for 3G data there will actually be; the requirement to support multiple generations of radio access technology, each with distinct base station interfaces; and the extent to which convergence of wireline and wireless operations will influence network design. Despite these uncertainties, some key trends have emerged as carriers begin the migration to packet-switched backhaul networks. These include:
Access is Still King The three options are: copper (digital subscriber line (DSL), T1/E1, or possibly Ethernet); radio (microwave, satellite, 6GHz fixed wireless systems); and Fibre (Ethernet, ATM, or TDM), with each having distinct advantages and disadvantages.
Microwave is Booming Microwave vendors aren't complaining; Despite unit price declines of 15 percent to 20 percent per year, many report annual sales growth of 20 percent to 30 percent in recent years, with no sign of a slowdown. Ericsson AB (Nasdaq: ERIC) stormed the market with its Mini-Link Traffic Node products, but Alcatel (NYSE: ALA; Paris: CGEP:PA), in partnership with Stratex Networks Inc. (Nasdaq: STXN)), Siemens AG (NYSE: SI; Frankfurt: SIE), and others, is fighting back with microwave aggregation products of its own. The most popular products are still short-haul Plesiochronous Digital Hierarchy (PDH) microwave links capable of up to 16xE1, but some operators, especially in Europe, are starting to deploy higher-capacity Synchronous Digital Hierarchy (SDH) microwave, with vendors providing software keys for pay-as-you-grow capacity upgrades from 8xE1 to 32xE1 and beyond. Technological initiatives include the addition of Ethernet ports and introduction of adaptive modulation schemes.
Cell Site and Remote Aggregation Nodes Emerge The advantages of such products are that 2G and 3G traffic can be sent over a single northbound link into the network; that any type of interface can be used; and that bandwidth optimization techniques can be applied. Vendors providing these types of products include Celtro Inc. , Carrier Access Corp. (Nasdaq: CACS), Cisco Systems Inc. (Nasdaq: CSCO), Eastern Research Inc. , NMS Communications Corp. , and RAD Data Communications Ltd. .
Psuedowires Find a Role
Competing Approaches to the Aggregation and Metro Buildout Having multiple traffic types – TDM, ATM, IP – converge at the aggregation POPs presents operators with an opportunity to streamline the network from this point onward into the metro and core switching and data centres. The challenge is how best to do this. Due to the need to support an extensive installed base of TDM and ATM equipment, much of which is still at high book value on operator balance sheets, the focus is squarely on various types of multiservice transport equipment. In a nutshell, this means making critical decisions between architectures based around Multiservice Provisioning Platforms (MSPPs) for next-gen ynchronous Optical Networking (Sonet)/SDH networks, ATM-based Multiservice Switches (MSS), and IP/Ethernet-orientated Multiservice Switch/Routers. Given that cellular backhaul is just one possible application for wireline transport products, almost all major networking vendors have some relevant positioning here, including Alcatel, Cisco, ECI Telecom Ltd. , Ericsson, Fujitsu Network Communications Inc. , Juniper Networks Inc. (Nasdaq: JNPR), Lucent Technologies Inc. (NYSE: LU), Nortel Networks Ltd. , Siemens, and Tellabs Inc. (Nasdaq: TLAB; Frankfurt: BTLA). — Gabriel Brown, Chief Analyst, Unstrung Insider The report, Wireless Backhaul & 3G Network Economics, is available as part of an annual subscription (12 monthly issues) to Unstrung Insider, priced at $1,350. Individual reports are available for $900. To subscribe, please visit: www.unstrung.com/insider.
Newest Comments First Display in Chronological Order
Be the first to post a comment regarding this story.
UNSTRUNG MARKET PLACE
The blogs and comments are the opinions only of the writers and do not reflect the views of Unstrung. They are no substitute for your own research and should not be relied upon for trading or any other purpose. |
Related Content
Cable Next-Gen Broadband Strategies: Docsis 3.0, Wireless, Fiber & Beyond
Thursday, February 25, 2010 The Cable Center, Denver Tower Technology Summit
March 23- 25, 2010 Las Vegas Convention Center, Las Vegas Policy Control, DPI & The Mobile Packet Core
March 24, 2010 Las Vegas Ethernet Europe
Monday & Tuesday, April 12 & 13, 2010 London Marriott Hotel Grosvenor Square, London OSS Virtual Event
Tuesday, April 20, 2010 Most Popular
Where Is the Sprint 3G Femtocell? 2/1/2010
Symbian: It's Really Free, Baby 2/4/2010
LTE Watch: Size Matters 1/29/2010
AT&T Wants Nexus One Users' Cash 1/7/2010
Jobs: Adobe Is Lazy 2/1/2010
White Papers SPONSORED CONTENT
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||