LAS VEGAS -- CTIA Wireless 2008 -- Sprint Nextel Corp. (NYSE: S) will not now commit to a launch date commercial Xohm WiMax services, although the original plans for an April launch appear to have been been ditched by the third-ranked U.S. cellular operator. (See CES: Sprint's in the XOHM.)
Unstrung caught up with Sprint 4G chief and CTO, Barry West, at the operator's WiMax event on Tuesday evening to get more info on Xohm. West said he won't say what the launch date is for the service, as you'll see in this exclusive video:
The operator had originally planned a limited April launch of commercial services in markets such as Chicago and Baltimore-Washington, D.C. These networks will, however, remain employee-testbeds for the moment.
The Xohm launch date is not the only question that causes Sprint to clam up. West made it clear that the operator would not comment on "rumor and speculation" at the possibility of a renewed partnership with WiMax rival Clearwire LLC (Nasdaq: CLWR). (See CTIA: Sprint's Samsung Touch.)
"There are certain questions [we] cannot and will not answer, so save your time and effort," West declared earlier.
West was much more ebullient on the technical issues of deploying WiMax, however, talking up mini-basestations as a way to solve any potential issues that the 2.5GHz-compatible radios might have with good coverage inside the home.
"I'm a big proponent of femtocells," he says. "I expect we could see some in production early next year.
West also says that he is happy to describe WiMax, as well as Long-Term Evolution (LTE), as fourth-generation (4G) wireless technology. West's reasoning being that the technologies are all based on "next generation" radio signal-processing technology called Orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM), which supports multiple data streams to help improve transfer speeds and improve resistance to interference.
Dan, Of course they can post it -- but perhaps they are under intense pressure to "shut up". Hence my comment that perhaps some other "journalists" like you might be interested in the story. Frankly I find it hard to imagine the doc is that negative. Facts are facts. Spin is spin. But "suppression" of the story is another matter.
On your previous post the link did not work (for me at least). And yes the Certification of 2.3 profile is fine but no big story. It has been certified in the field with these vendors for quite awhile. Is anyone else using 2.3GHz WiBro? Or planning to? I thought WiMAX was the global standard? My point - this was/is a "political" milestone not a "technical" milestone.
They appear to have an online presence. Maybe the stories are losing something in translation but I guess I'm not understanding why they couldn't post it themselves. Enlighten me here.
The blogs and comments are the opinions only of the writers and do not reflect the views of Unstrung. They are no substitute for your own research and should not be relied upon for trading or any other purpose.
To save this item to your list of favorite Unstrung content so you can find it later in your Profile page, click the "Save It" button next to the item.
If you found this interesting or useful, please use the links to the services below to share it with other readers. You will need a free account with each service to share an item via that service.
Digg
Del.icio.us
Reddit